---
module: 005-02
language: en
chapter: 5
title: "Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safe Prescribing"
module_title: "Exposure, variability, and prescribing as a control process"
source_sha256: eeb6d62a703768da9ac3dc39b8b4c87adccc7052404edd5117bfb069e1839a5c
---
# Exposure, variability, and prescribing as control

## Concentration over time
### Dose is input, exposure is the concentration pattern
### Area under the curve: total systemic exposure
### Peak, time above target, or total exposure
#### Each predicts different effects or toxicity
### Same daily dose, not always equivalent regimens
#### Divided dosing lowers peaks, raises troughs
#### Rapid bolus: high early concentration
### Distribution phase fall, then slower elimination
#### Early sampling overstates clearance
### Lipid-soluble redistribution prolongs sedation
### Half-life rises as clearance falls or volume rises
#### Critical illness changes both at once

## Capacity, extraction, and organ disease
### High extraction: clearance follows liver blood flow
### Low extraction: enzyme activity and unbound fraction
### Liver disease does not reduce pathways uniformly
#### Liver tests do not quantify drug clearance
### Active secretion removes protein-bound drug
### Competing drugs inhibit renal transporters
### Urine pH alters weak acid and base reabsorption
### Creatinine estimate lags behind changing filtration
### Replacement therapy removes small, unbound, low-volume drugs
#### Levels help only with meaningful assay and timing
### Saturable metabolism creates non-linearity
#### Near saturation, small dose rise, large level rise
### Autoinduction and active metabolites add delay

## Free concentration and binding shifts
### Total level includes bound and unbound drug
### Low albumin raises the unbound fraction
#### Total falls while active exposure is adequate
#### Total-only reading can prompt unsafe increase
### Displacement is usually transient
#### Matters with limited clearance, narrow margin
### Bilirubin and uraemic toxins alter binding
### Tissue binding prolongs action
#### Lysosomes, bone, melanin, intracellular targets
#### Normal level does not exclude drug toxicity

## Receptor pharmacology into dose choice
### Individual dose-response curve rarely known
### Therapeutic and adverse curves differ
#### Benefit plateaus while harm keeps rising
#### Useful dose is not the maximum tolerated
### Competitive blockade fails when agonist is limited
### Irreversible antagonist: wait for new receptors
### Physiological antagonist opposes via another process
### Tolerance should trigger mechanistic review
#### Faster metabolism, desensitisation, progression
#### Poor adherence or interaction mimics tolerance
### Placebo and nocebo are genuine effects
#### Balanced explanation reduces nocebo burden

## Interactions as mechanisms
### Move beyond counting alerts
### Absorption: chelation, acidity, gut binding, motility
### Metabolism: specific enzyme inhibition or induction
### Transporters: uptake, hepatic entry, biliary, renal
### Perpetrator affects only pathway-dependent drugs
### Pharmacodynamic: additive, synergistic, antagonistic
#### Sedatives converge on ventilation and airway
#### Small effects sum beyond physiological reserve
### Inhibition starts fast, induction builds and fades
#### Effect persists beyond the final dose
### Avoid, adjust, monitor levels, or substitute

## Prescribing as feedback control
### Target, intervene, measure, adjust or stop
### No review time or success criterion is open loop
#### Unsafe when physiology is changing
### Keep the indication attached to each medicine
### Make duration explicit
### Deprescribing is not simply deleting
#### Anticipate withdrawal, change one variable
#### Taper when cessation exposes adaptation

## Execution and reassessment
### Patient ability shapes real exposure
#### Vision, dexterity, cognition, cost, support
### Simplify, demonstrate, pharmacist review
### Deterioration: build a medication timeline
#### Caused, unmasked, failed, or obscured
### Confirm what was actually taken and when
### Match levels to sampling and last dose times
### Loop closes when patient and clinician share goal
